Investment from $200,000

Investment from $104,000

Investment from $19,057

Investment from $100,000

Investment from $395,000

Investment from $35,000

Investment from $70,000

Investment from $100,000

Investment from $500,000

Investment from $200,000

Investment from $240,000

Investment from $269,550

Investment from $700,000

Investment from $68,000

Investment from $336,942

Investment from $73,000

Investment on demand

Investment from $310,442

Investment from $9,500

Investment from $464,500

Investment from $346,775

Investment from $865,000

Investment from $1,800,000

Investment from $2,168,419

Investment from $30,000

Investment from $92,255

Investment from $222,095

Investment from $1,651,500

Investment from $173,600

Investment from $1,100

Investment from $185,500

Investment from $300,000

Investment from $178,523

Investment from $383,500

Investment from $124,750

Investment from $12,000

Investment from $858,500

Investment from $859,700

Investment from $156,385

Investment from $375,500

Investment from $1,865,000

Investment from $6,500

Investment from $228,300

Investment from $375,000

Investment from $457,500

Investment from $1,500,000

Investment from $284,000

Investment from $314,550

Investment from $670,400

Investment from $781,000

Investment from $12,000

Investment from $2,695,100

Investment from $293,840

Investment from $28,000

Investment from $1,375,000

Investment from $121,400

Investment from $228,000

Investment from $956,500

Investment from $100,000

Investment from $238,600

Investment from $300,000

Investment from $503,950

Investment from $268,000

Investment from $1,469,000

Investment from $415,230

Investment from $365,000

Investment from $191,014

Investment from $302,000

Investment from $130,120

Investment from $122,250

Investment from $216,354

Investment from $112,900

Investment from $211,432

Investment from $347,000

Investment from $99,128

Investment from $714,400

Investment from $1,442,550

Investment from $203,000

Investment from $74,780

Investment from $289,780

Investment from $133,500

Investment from $505,500

Investment from $11,000

Investment from $2,009,038

Investment from $156,650

Investment from $1,395,695

Investment from $351,200

Investment from $475,000

Investment from $1,567,500

Investment from $8,261

Investment from $274,981

Investment from $137,739

Investment from $41,369

Investment from $1,170,000

Summary

Food franchises scale well across countries because the mechanics are stable — menu, line, staffing, delivery — but the cost field is local. U.S. neighborhood rents sit in the mid-$20s/sf/year, Canadian prime is higher, European/UK high streets can be several times that, and Gulf malls are premium. Add local wages, energy tariffs and 15–30% delivery commissions, and every project must be modeled per market.

A food franchise turns repeatable, everyday demand into a standardized operating model. Whether it’s burgers, chicken, coffee, bowls or casual dining, the underlying play is the same: engineer the menu so it moves through the line fast, match staff to the real dayparts, and keep delivery/pickup from blocking dine-in. For first-time buyers, franchise systems remove guesswork around recipes, equipment and training. For multi-unit operators, they make it possible to copy the same box across cities and even countries, as long as rent, labor and utilities are refreshed for each location.

The part that changes from country to country is not the format — it’s the price tag around it.

Regional cost picture

United States. Typical strip/lifestyle retail runs around the mid-$20s per sq ft per year. Good end-caps, drive-thru pads and tourist pockets are 2–3× that. Entry-level foodservice wages are mostly in the mid-teens per hour but some states and big metros sit higher, and long opening hours make utilities visible.

Canada. Major cities tend to be a bit pricier than the U.S. baseline once converted. Wages are broadly comparable, utilities are predictable, but equipment and some food imports can add to startup. You usually start near the top of the investment range.

Europe / UK. Prime, high-footfall streets in London, Paris, Milan or Amsterdam can be several times more expensive than neighborhood sites. Labor is more regulated and social charges add up. Delivery apps work off similar 15–30% commission tiers, so European units protect margin with daypart offers, tight menus and smaller boxes.

Gulf / Middle East. Malls, waterfronts and obvious tourist spots are premium, and operators often have service charges and fit-out standards on top of rent. On paper labor can look lower, but housing/visa/transport ends up in the real monthly bill. That’s why food concepts in the Gulf must be tested on local numbers, not on a U.S. template.

Investment and Fees

Format / Model Initial investment (range) Franchise fee (range) Ongoing fees (royalty / ad fund)
Kiosk / small box $90,000 – $300,000 $10,000 – $30,000 4–6% / 1–2%
Inline fast casual (counter) $300,000 – $900,000 $20,000 – $50,000 4–6% / 1–3%
Drive-thru pad / end-cap $800,000 – $2,200,000 $25,000 – $60,000 4–6% / 1–4%
Full-service (dine-in) $900,000 – $2,500,000 $30,000 – $60,000 4–6% / 1–3%
Ghost kitchen / mobile trailer $60,000 – $200,000 $10,000 – $25,000 4–6% / 0–2%

These ranges “travel” between countries, but local building codes (hood, venting, grease traps), utility specs, equipment import and landlord standards can push a project to the upper band.

Startup and operating costs

Startup normally includes: leasehold build-out, floors and plumbing, hood/venting where required, the brand’s equipment package (fryers/grills/ovens or coffee/bar gear), refrigeration, smallwares, POS/KDS, signage, opening inventory, staff training and working capital.

Ongoing spend looks like this:

  • franchise royalty and marketing contributions;
  • labor (matched to real dayparts);
  • food and packaging (with attention to volatile items — meat, dairy, produce);
  • occupancy (rent, CAM, insurance, service charges);
  • utilities (kitchen load + HVAC or long opening hours);
  • delivery/app commissions at 15–30% on delivery and around 6% on pickup;
  • maintenance and periodic capex.

Because food concepts are high-frequency and often low-ticket, the P&L is usually protected by three levers: throughput (orders per labor hour), average ticket (combos, add-ons, premium items) and real-estate efficiency (second-gen sites, right box for the trade area).

Formats and site strategy

Kiosk / small box. Lowest capex, good for captive footfall (malls, transit, office towers). Storage planning is the trick.

Inline fast casual. Compact FOH, strong pickup and delivery, easy to staff; works in dense trade areas.

Drive-thru. Convenience leader; success lives in access, car stacking and a protected handoff window.

Full-service. Higher check via experience, table service and beverages; more labor and licensing, so needs a stable trade area.

Ghost / mobile. Fastest to open, rent-efficient; visibility moves to apps, photos, promise times and events.

Operator profile

Most systems want owners with enough liquid capital to finish the build-out at local prices, a stable hiring/scheduling habit, and the discipline to run checklists and food-safety daily. Prior restaurant experience helps, but a good training and field-ops stack can close the gap quickly. For international or multi-country projects there are four mandatory checks before signing: real rent (not marketing rates), current local wages, energy tariffs for your exact equipment load, and delivery-platform terms.

What to tell buyers directly

  • Price the project on the country you’re opening in, not on a U.S. brochure.
  • Pull current utility tariffs if the concept runs hot kitchens or long hours.
  • Keep delivery as a revenue channel, not the main margin channel.
  • Favor second-gen sites where possible — they compress capex and timelines.
  • Plan an opening marketing ramp; footfall does not appear by itself.

Testimonials